Listen Live
St. Jude Radiothon 2024
CLOSE

A federal appeals court on Friday reinstated in-person early voting in the swing state of Ohio on the final three days before the Nov. 6 election, handing a victory to President Barack Obama’s campaign.

But local boards of elections would have the discretion to decide whether to allow voters to cast an early ballot on the weekend and Monday before Election Day — just as they had the ability to do so in 2008.

The ruling by the three-judge panel of the 6th U.S. Court of Appeals in Cincinnati came in a case targeting a state law that ends early voting for most residents on the Friday evening before a Tuesday election. The law makes an exception for military personnel and Ohio voters living overseas.

Obama’s campaign and Democrats sued Ohio’s Secretary of State Jon Husted and Attorney General Mike DeWine, both Republicans, over the legality of the law. They argued that everyone should have a chance to vote on those days.

Husted said his office was still reviewing the 6th Circuit’s decision, and that no action would be taken on Friday or this weekend.

Ohio is among 34 states, plus the District of Columbia, where people can vote early without giving any reason.

The Democrats who sued said a series of legislative changes by state lawmakers had arbitrarily eliminated the opportunity for most Ohio residents to vote in person on the three final days before the election, while giving military or overseas voters the chance to do so.

Attorneys for the state have said many laws already grant military personnel special voting accommodations, such as requirements for states to send them absentee ballots 45 days before the election. And they contend local boards also need those three days to prepare for the election.

U.S. District Judge Peter Economus in Columbus had ruled that voters’ right to cast ballots in person on those three final days outweighs the state’s reasons for limiting that opportunity. The judge issued a preliminary injunction on Aug. 31, concluding that the state’s law was unconstitutional in changing the in-person early voting deadline and that the state was wrongly valuing certain votes above others.

The appeals court affirmed the lower court’s ruling on Friday.

CLICK HERE to read story

article courtesy of TheGrio.com

Leave a Reply